Freedom Pub

Liberty on Tap since 1984

I don't know about you, but every time I come across the phrase "crony capitalism" I get teed off. Cronyism is not exclusive to capitalism.

Out of curiosity, I decided to Google the phrase. surprisingly, to me, much has been written on the subject. Let me share some of what I found.

Of all places, a web site called "wise Geek" we have the following definition of crony capitalism.

Crony capitalism is a condition in which participants in an economy rooted in capitalism earn and manipulate favor with one or more government entities. The favor is generally not based on quality or merit; instead the relationship is normally based on political posturing that results in both the capitalists in business and the government officials determine such a relationship would be mutually advantageous. In the worst examples, this variant of capitalism creates a situation where taxes collected from citizens are used to purchase overpriced goods and services from favored suppliers, who in turn influence the creation and application of laws impacting business operations.

Now that we have workable definition let's see what some conservative pundits have had to say on the subject.

Professor Dom Armentano wrote an article for LewRockwell.com titled "Crony Capitalism is Not Capitalism". he starts his essay with this:

"It's all the current fashion to dump on "capitalism."

"It was the greedy free market, supposedly, that created both the housing bubble and the housing bust and led, inevitably, to the "great recession." Capitalism, according to most liberal pundits (and even Alan Greenspan in a bad mood), is an inherently risky and unstable system that requires government regulation to correct its flaws and moderate its excesses."

The Professor does a masterful job of defending capitalism and condemning crony capitalism. It's worth reading the whole article. He ends his piece with the following:

"Yet the political class, always absolving itself of all blame, would have you believe that capitalist greed caused the recession and that political regulators need more power. Not so. What we actually require are constraints on monetary growth, more competitive markets, balanced budgets and less output-restricting regulation. But first and foremost, before we spend and regulate further, we require an informed media and an enlightened public that can distinguish real capitalism from phony, crony capitalism."

Right On, Professor. You nailed it.

Senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner, Michael Barone wrote in February, "Under Obama, crony capitalism rules the day". In his article, he draws a comparison between crony capitalism during World War II with what is occurring in the Obama administration today. Here's his ending paragraph:

"Back in the 1940s, there was an excuse for crony capitalism -- there was a war on. And FDR had a gift for picking people who, like Kaiser, delivered the goods. Today that excuse is not available, and it's far from apparent that Obama has that gift."

I think Mr. Barone has the President pretty well sized-up.

All of the above three references did a fine job of defending capitalism and condemning crony capitalism. But I'm not satisfied. In my opinion, the words "crony" and "capitalism" do not belong together and should not be used together. Cronyism is the antithesis of capitalism. Cronyism is found across the political spectrum. There was cronyism in nazi Germany, there was cronyism in the fascist regimes of Mussolini and Franco, there is cronyism in the social democratic countries of the world today, and there is rampant cronyism in the Marxist regime of Chavez in Venezuela. Those who practice cronyism are morally corrupt opportunist and should be condemned where ever they are found.

I'm calling on the Tea Party Patriots and all capitalist to denounce those that insist on putting the two words together; no matter their political color. The term cronyism is used so often in combination with capitalism, that many of the uneducated are turned-off entirely to capitalism. We can not let this stand.

Note:Check out The Freedom Project

Views: 9

Tags: Cronyism, capitalism

Comment

You need to be a member of Freedom Pub to add comments!

Join Freedom Pub

Comment by Liberty4USA on November 21, 2010 at 3:45pm
Mr. Gourdie or Jimmy,
Thanks for your comments and appreciation. I am thinking of adding a new section into our newsletter based on fighting the lefts favorite weapon, political correctness, and you can take some credit for that.

The next issue comes out on Dec. 3 and our new logo banner will be out for that issue also.

I am always looking for thoughtful bloggers with substance in their writings to contribute articles to the newsletter. Alan Caruba is a writer that allows me to republish for example.

If you are interested please contact me at Dave@rightingourconsent.com
Comment by Jimmy Gourdie on November 21, 2010 at 8:34am
BTW, Liberty4USA, your comment provoked me write a new post on the subject at Conservatives On Fire and I featured your comment. I hope you don't mind.
Comment by Jimmy Gourdie on November 21, 2010 at 8:28am
Liberty4USA you got it exactly right. I appreciate your comment very much. I just came back from visiting your "Righting Our Consent" news letter. You're doing a terrific job there. I specially like the article "Arrogance or Humility?". I hope you don't mind but I'm going to link your news letter on my home site blog Conservatives On Fire. The news letter doesn't show a home page so I'll link to your archives page. Keep-up the great work.

Cheers!

Jim
Comment by Liberty4USA on November 20, 2010 at 8:44pm
The mantra of the hard left of center groups is that capitalism does not work. Since we have a mixed economy (more so everyday) of socialism and capitalism it is easy to point to the failures and blame them on the wrong end of that mixture. Since redefining terms (which includes inventing new ones) is how the progressives have been able to wedge open the Constitution and claim that governments contract with our citizens for self government actually means something entirely different than what it actually says they have become experts at twisting and inventing definitions. After all why are the few and defined powers listed in our Constitution now many and seemingly indefinite? Judges saw plain words and were convinced to change the meanings of those words which of course led to more of the same. The term crony capitalism would more aptly be termed "business and politicians cheating for mutual benefit," which of course leaves the only competition as the race to see who can get their deal first.
Since the important safeguard of the states checking their senators actions disintegrated with the passage of the 17th Amendment the game was on. When someone like Obama talks of special interests as if he is immune from them, while he plays them for all they are worth, and there are so few howling from either party, one can reasonably expect that they are all playing this game that has nothing to do with real capitalism.
Comment by Full Boar on October 16, 2010 at 2:27am
Love your post, Jimmy. You do a nice job of defining the term therefore framing the debate. I have used wisegeek.com to support an argument as well. That site does a good job of defining terms. I have often arged that with much less regulations, and a lower Corporate tax rate, Capitalism would flurish and not be the "evil" it is portrayed to be.

Other Heartland SItes

© 2012   Created by Freedom Pub.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service