Liberty on Tap since 1984
WILL: … Let me ask the three of you. Obviously, obesity and its costs affect interstate commerce. Does Congress have the constitutional power to require obese people to sign up for Weight Watchers? If not, why not?As Richman notes, none of the liberal panelists had an answer — or even attempted to address the core question of the constitutional limits of federal power. Quips Richman:
The whirring sound you could hear in the background was the Founders spinning.So, too, must have been former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, among the first modern "progressives" on the Court.
Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.You can find no such humility, let alone "understanding" in today's brand of progressive, as George Will's unanswered question revealed. One of those progressives who lack Brandeis' understanding is our newest Supreme Court Justice, Elena Kagan — who couldn't even give a straight, logical and simple answer when asked if the federal government could use the Commerce Clause to mandate that Americans eat a more-healthy diet.
COBURN: Well, I guess the question I am asking is: Do we have the power to tell people what they have to eat every day?The correct answer is: Of course not — at least to progressives of a generation ago. Today's breed of progressive believes that what they can't encourage by persuasion must be compelled by law. And that's what has conservatives and libertarians so worried — and why the modern Tea Party came forth.
KAGAN: [long pause], Senator Coburn, [pause], um, [pause], I, I –
© 2012 Created by Freedom Pub.
You need to be a member of Freedom Pub to add comments!
Join Freedom Pub